The 60-second version of P.M. Telelinnks Limited — what it does, how it earns, and who it competes with, before any of the numbers below.
No clear supporting case emerges from the available numbers.
| Metric | FY23 | FY24 | FY25 | FY26 | 3Y CAGR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | ₹32 Cr | ₹31 Cr | ₹7 Cr | ₹3 Cr | -54.8% |
| EBITDA | ₹0 Cr | ₹0 Cr | ₹0 Cr | -₹0 Cr | — |
| EBITDA Margin | 0.7% | 0.3% | 0.2% | -4.5% | — |
| PAT (Net Profit) | ₹0 Cr | ₹0 Cr | ₹0 Cr | -₹4 Cr | — |
| EPS | ₹0.16 | ₹0.08 | — | ₹-3.85 | — |
| ROE | 1.9% | 0.9% | 0.1% | -81.7% | — |
| ROCE | 2.7% | 1.2% | 0.2% | -81.6% | — |
| Free Cash Flow | -₹2 Cr | -₹0 Cr | ₹0 Cr | ₹0 Cr | — |
| Company | P/E | ROE |
|---|---|---|
| TATA STEEL LIMITED | 19.8x | 10.8% |
| JSW STEEL LIMITED | 12.0x | 24.7% |
| JINDAL STEEL LIMITED | 39.1x | 5.3% |
| STEEL AUTHORITY OF INDIA | 16.5x | 7.1% |
Poor scores on business quality without a price low enough to compensate. There is no obvious argument for owning this over a stronger company at a similar valuation. 3 high-severity red flags sit above this conclusion and should be read first.