The 60-second version of Poddar Pigments Limited — what it does, how it earns, and who it competes with, before any of the numbers below.
| Metric | FY23 | FY24 | FY25 | FY26 | 3Y CAGR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | ₹337 Cr | ₹369 Cr | ₹365 Cr | ₹372 Cr | +3.4% |
| EBITDA | ₹43 Cr | ₹46 Cr | ₹38 Cr | ₹35 Cr | -6.5% |
| EBITDA Margin | 12.7% | 12.4% | 10.3% | 9.4% | — |
| PAT (Net Profit) | ₹27 Cr | ₹29 Cr | ₹23 Cr | ₹15 Cr | -18.6% |
| EPS | ₹25.77 | ₹27.16 | ₹21.51 | ₹13.91 | -18.6% |
| ROE | 9.3% | 8.3% | 6.3% | 4.2% | — |
| ROCE | 12.4% | 10.8% | 8.2% | 5.8% | — |
| Total Debt | — | — | ₹12 Cr | ₹6 Cr | — |
| Free Cash Flow | ₹12 Cr | -₹5 Cr | -₹12 Cr | ₹22 Cr | +24.9% |
| Company | P/E | ROE |
|---|---|---|
| ASIAN PAINTS LIMITED | 46.9x | 22.3% |
| PIDILITE INDUSTRIES LTD | 57.8x | 24.4% |
| SRF LTD | 33.8x | 15.4% |
| UPL LIMITED | 21.5x | 6.1% |
Poor scores on business quality without a price low enough to compensate. There is no obvious argument for owning this over a stronger company at a similar valuation. 2 high-severity red flags sit above this conclusion and should be read first.