The 60-second version of Prudential Sugar Corporation Ltd. — what it does, how it earns, and who it competes with, before any of the numbers below.
Nothing stands out as clearly deteriorating on the years of data available.
| Metric | FY23 | FY24 | FY25 | FY26 | 3Y CAGR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | ₹81 Cr | ₹105 Cr | ₹92 Cr | ₹91 Cr | +4.2% |
| EBITDA | ₹7 Cr | ₹9 Cr | ₹10 Cr | ₹10 Cr | +14.6% |
| EBITDA Margin | 8.5% | 9.0% | 11.2% | 11.3% | — |
| PAT (Net Profit) | ₹5 Cr | ₹6 Cr | ₹6 Cr | ₹6 Cr | +9.2% |
| EPS | ₹1.23 | ₹1.94 | ₹1.74 | ₹1.86 | +14.8% |
| ROE | 4.7% | 5.9% | 5.1% | 5.2% | — |
| ROCE | 7.1% | 7.1% | 7.3% | 7.7% | — |
| Total Debt | ₹0 Cr | ₹30 Cr | ₹48 Cr | ₹46 Cr | +642.9% |
| Free Cash Flow | -₹2 Cr | -₹24 Cr | -₹20 Cr | ₹6 Cr | — |
| Company | P/E | ROE |
|---|---|---|
| HINDUSTAN UNILEVER LTD. | 42.5x | 21.5% |
| ITC LTD | 16.6x | 27.4% |
| NESTLE INDIA LIMITED | 59.8x | 79.9% |
| BRITANNIA INDUSTRIES LTD | 44.1x | 51.0% |
A reasonable business at a reasonable price. Nothing here is alarming and nothing is compelling, which usually means the decision rests on things this data cannot see — the industry's direction, management's intent, and what else is available to you. 2 high-severity red flags sit above this conclusion and should be read first.