The 60-second version of Restaurant Brands Asia Limited — what it does, how it earns, and who it competes with, before any of the numbers below.
Nothing stands out as clearly deteriorating on the years of data available.
| Metric | FY23 | FY24 | FY25 | FY26 | 3Y CAGR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | ₹2,049 Cr | ₹2,412 Cr | ₹2,533 Cr | ₹2,801 Cr | +11.0% |
| EBITDA | ₹132 Cr | ₹269 Cr | ₹282 Cr | ₹359 Cr | +39.6% |
| EBITDA Margin | 6.4% | 11.2% | 11.1% | 12.8% | — |
| PAT (Net Profit) | -₹221 Cr | -₹218 Cr | -₹216 Cr | -₹187 Cr | — |
| EPS | ₹-4.48 | ₹-4.4 | ₹-4.33 | ₹-3.19 | — |
| ROE | -26.8% | -34.8% | -23.8% | -25.9% | — |
| ROCE | -7.2% | -4.6% | -2.7% | -0.6% | — |
| Total Debt | ₹1,168 Cr | ₹1,430 Cr | ₹1,832 Cr | ₹1,967 Cr | +19.0% |
| Free Cash Flow | -₹228 Cr | ₹64 Cr | ₹73 Cr | -₹70 Cr | — |
| Company | P/E | ROE |
|---|---|---|
| MARUTI SUZUKI INDIA LTD. | 25.2x | 13.4% |
| TITAN COMPANY LIMITED | 68.5x | 36.7% |
| TRENT LTD | 87.2x | 25.9% |
| AVENUE SUPERMARTS LIMITED | 69.9x | 12.7% |
Poor scores on business quality without a price low enough to compensate. There is no obvious argument for owning this over a stronger company at a similar valuation. 6 high-severity red flags sit above this conclusion and should be read first.