The 60-second version of RRIL Limited — what it does, how it earns, and who it competes with, before any of the numbers below.
| Metric | FY23 | FY24 | FY25 | FY26 | 3Y CAGR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | ₹155 Cr | ₹95 Cr | ₹113 Cr | ₹122 Cr | -7.6% |
| EBITDA | ₹21 Cr | ₹10 Cr | ₹12 Cr | ₹15 Cr | -11.0% |
| EBITDA Margin | 13.6% | 10.4% | 10.4% | 12.2% | — |
| PAT (Net Profit) | ₹14 Cr | ₹6 Cr | ₹7 Cr | ₹9 Cr | -14.3% |
| EPS | ₹1.13 | ₹0.48 | ₹0.56 | ₹0.72 | -13.9% |
| ROE | 14.9% | 5.8% | 6.5% | 7.6% | — |
| ROCE | 19.7% | 8.2% | 8.8% | 9.9% | — |
| Total Debt | ₹20 Cr | ₹15 Cr | ₹15 Cr | ₹34 Cr | +19.7% |
| Free Cash Flow | ₹9 Cr | ₹1 Cr | -₹16 Cr | -₹2 Cr | — |
| Company | P/E | ROE |
|---|---|---|
| MARUTI SUZUKI INDIA LTD. | 25.2x | 13.4% |
| TITAN COMPANY LIMITED | 68.5x | 36.7% |
| TRENT LTD | 87.2x | 25.9% |
| AVENUE SUPERMARTS LIMITED | 69.9x | 12.7% |
The low price is the whole case here, and the business underneath scores poorly. Cheap-and-weak is what a value trap looks like from the outside — it needs a specific reason the numbers are about to improve, not just the observation that they are low. 2 high-severity red flags sit above this conclusion and should be read first.