The 60-second version of RSWM Limited — what it does, how it earns, and who it competes with, before any of the numbers below.
| Metric | FY23 | FY24 | FY25 | FY26 | 3Y CAGR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | ₹3,733 Cr | ₹3,966 Cr | ₹4,716 Cr | ₹4,471 Cr | +6.2% |
| EBITDA | ₹299 Cr | ₹159 Cr | ₹257 Cr | ₹340 Cr | +4.4% |
| EBITDA Margin | 8.0% | 4.0% | 5.5% | 7.6% | — |
| PAT (Net Profit) | ₹123 Cr | -₹21 Cr | -₹40 Cr | ₹52 Cr | -24.9% |
| EPS | ₹31.52 | ₹-4.47 | ₹-8.5 | ₹11.04 | -29.5% |
| ROE | 9.3% | -1.6% | -3.1% | 3.8% | — |
| ROCE | 11.5% | 3.8% | 4.9% | 8.7% | — |
| Total Debt | ₹1,157 Cr | ₹1,890 Cr | ₹1,716 Cr | ₹1,688 Cr | +13.4% |
| Free Cash Flow | -₹245 Cr | -₹307 Cr | ₹298 Cr | ₹251 Cr | — |
| Company | P/E | ROE |
|---|---|---|
| MARUTI SUZUKI INDIA LTD. | 25.2x | 13.4% |
| TITAN COMPANY LIMITED | 68.5x | 36.7% |
| TRENT LTD | 87.2x | 25.9% |
| AVENUE SUPERMARTS LIMITED | 69.9x | 12.7% |
The low price is the whole case here, and the business underneath scores poorly. Cheap-and-weak is what a value trap looks like from the outside — it needs a specific reason the numbers are about to improve, not just the observation that they are low. 1 high-severity red flag sits above this conclusion and should be read first.