Driven by negative free cash flow, the company is currently loss-making, micro-cap size, which brings thin liquidity.
In simple words: The company is currently losing money. Cash generation is currently the main factor to watch.
Decision support, not a buy or sell call.
As of 18 Oct 2026, 6:08 pm
Caution warranted. Multiple fundamental metrics — flagged in red below — point to either valuation stretch, leverage risk, or weakening profitability. This doesn't mean avoid the stock outright, but it does mean the burden of proof is on the growth story to justify the current price.
The 60-second version of Samsrita Labs Limited — what it does, how it earns, and who it competes with, before any of the numbers below.
What does this company do?
Samsrita Labs Limited operates as a biopharmaceutical company in India.
IndustryDiagnostics & Research
SectorHealthcare
Employees5
Annual revenue₹0 Cr
How does it make money?
Turns over ₹0 Cr a year. Of every ₹100 of sales, about ₹-45001 reaches shareholders as profit, with ₹39541 left at the operating level before interest, tax and depreciation. Each of its 5 employees supports ₹36,268 of revenue a year, the signature of a people-led business.
EBITDA margin39541.0%
Net margin-45000.7%
Revenue / employee₹36,268
Who are its competitors?
The closest listed comparisons in its industry are SUN PHARMACEUTICAL IND L, CIPLA LTD, DR. REDDY S LABORATORIES, APOLLO HOSPITALS ENTER. L. These are the companies its valuation and returns are measured against elsewhere in this report.
SUN PHARMACEUTICAL IND LP/E 34.9x · ROE 14.5%
CIPLA LTDP/E 31.8x · ROE 9.8%
DR. REDDY S LABORATORIESP/E 31.0x · ROE 8.8%
APOLLO HOSPITALS ENTER. LP/E 54.3x · ROE 22.0%
What is its competitive advantage?Little sign of one
Returns on capital of -6.5% are at or below what the capital likely costs. That is the financial pattern of a business competing largely on price, where advantage has to come from execution rather than position.
ROCE-6.5%
ROE-69.4%
Peer median ROE14.5%
What has been driving growth?
Profit has moved mainly because margins changed, not because the business sold much more. Over 3 years revenue moved -16% while net margin moved +1280% relative to itself. What this cannot tell you is which products, customers or geographies did the work — that lives in the segment disclosures of the annual report.
Revenue effect-16%
Margin effect+1280%
DalalBaazaar Score
36/ 100
Weak
Weighted across six categories. Every point is explained below.
✗ Revenue has contracted at 5.7% a year
✗ Profit fell 2765.8% in the latest year
Quality vs. Valuation
Company Quality
36/ 100
Weak
How good the business is, ignoring the share price entirely.
vs
Valuation
49/ 100
Fair
What you are being asked to pay, ignoring how good the business is.
Weak on business quality and not cheap enough to compensate.
vs. its own history
Not enough price and earnings history
vs. sector peers
Not enough peers with a usable P/E
vs. generic bands
N/A
No P/E — the company is lossmaking
P/E (Trailing)
Not meaningful
P/B
2.39x
EV/EBITDA
3.9x
PEG
—
Dividend Yield
None
What's Good / What's Bad
🟢 What's Going Well3
Margins are improving
EBITDA margin is up from 2250.3% to 39541.0% over 3 years.
Debt is being paid down
Total debt is down 20% over 3 years.
Very low debt
Debt/Equity of 0.14x leaves the balance sheet with plenty of headroom.
🔴 What Needs Attention3
Free cash flow is negative
The business is not currently covering its capital spending from operations.
Return on equity is falling
ROE has dropped from -5.6% to -69.4% — each rupee of shareholder capital earns less than it did.
Return on capital is falling
ROCE has declined from -2.0% to -6.5% — often a sign of competition or overexpansion.
Red Flags
3 items require attention · 2 high · 1 watch
🔴Free cash flow negative for 3 yearsFinancial
The business has not covered its capital spending from operations for several years running, which has to be funded externally.
🔴The company is lossmakingFinancial
Net profit of -₹8 Cr in the latest reported year.
🟡Shareholders have been dilutedOwnership
Shares outstanding are up 54% over 3 years — each existing share owns a smaller slice of the company.
Investment Thesis
🟢 Bull CaseWhat could make this work?
Margin expansion has further to run
EBITDA margin has risen from 2250.3% to 39541.0%. If that holds, profit compounds faster than sales and today's multiple looks cheaper in hindsight than it does now.
Deleveraging frees up earnings
Debt is down 20% over 3 years. Every rupee of interest not paid drops to the bottom line, so profit can grow even if revenue does not.
🔴 Bear CaseWhat could go wrong?
Returns on shareholder capital are falling
ROE has dropped from -5.6% to -69.4%. Each rupee of equity earns less than it did, so profit growth increasingly depends on raising more capital rather than on the existing base working harder.
Earnings are hard to forecast
Profit has swung sharply from year to year, so any single year — good or bad — is a weak guide to the next. Cyclical earnings deserve lower multiples for that reason.
Size brings its own risk
Micro Cap businesses are thinly traded, so exits are harder in a falling market and single events move the price more than they would for a larger company.
Several serious flags at once
2 high-severity checks triggered. Individually each has an explanation; together they raise the chance that something structural is wrong rather than a one-off.
🟡 Key Things to WatchMeasurable tripwires, set against where this company stands today
1EBITDA margin holds above 39539%✓ 39541.0%
Two points below today's level — enough room for noise, tight enough to catch real compression.
2Free cash flow remains positive✗ -₹4 Cr
Profit that never becomes cash eventually stops being profit.
3Debt / EBITDA stays below 2x✓ 0.2x
The ratio lenders write covenants against; it survives a small or negative equity base, unlike Debt/Equity.
4ROCE stays above 8%✗ -6.5%
Falling returns on capital are usually competition arriving, and show up here before they reach the margin.
Investment Checklist
4 / 10 checks passed
✗ Strong return on equity (ROE ≥ 15%)
✗ Strong return on capital employed (ROCE ≥ 15%)
✗ Healthy net margin (≥ 10%)
✗ Generates positive free cash flow
✓ Manageable leverage (Debt/Equity < 1.0)
✓ Adequate short-term liquidity (Current Ratio ≥ 1.0)
✗ Profit growing year-over-year
✓ Not trading at an extreme valuation (P/E < 40x)
✓ Not buying right at the 52-week high
✗ Short-term technical trend isn't bearish
Price history
Quick Metrics
1 good · 4 neutral · 6 weak
Market Cap
₹28 Cr
Micro Cap
Smaller company — thin liquidity and deep drawdowns are normal here
P/E (Trailing)
Not meaningful
Loss-making
Earnings are negative, so a P/E multiple can't be read here
P/B Ratio
2.39x
Fair
Moderate premium to the company's book value
EPS (TTM)
₹-3.43
Loss-making
Negative earnings per share — the business is losing money
ROE
-69.4%
Weak
Weak capital efficiency
ROCE
-6.5%
Weak
Low return on total capital employed
Debt/Equity
0.14x
Low
Conservative leverage
Revenue Growth (YoY)
Not available
No data
Source didn't return this field
Profit Growth (YoY)
-2765.8%
Falling
Profits are shrinking
Dividend Yield
None
None
No dividend yield reported — usually means no payout, but verify if one was recently initiated
Free Cash Flow
-₹4 Cr
Cash burning
Spending more cash than the operations bring in
More Metrics
CMP
₹12.35
Operating Margin
-48285.0%
Weak
Thin margins leave little room for error
Net Margin
0.0%
Weak
Very little revenue reaches the bottom line
Current Ratio
1.00
Adequate
Adequate, but no real cushion
Beta (vs Nifty)
0.32
Defensive
Steadier than the market
52W Range Position
15%
Near low
Near its 52-week low
Technical Snapshot
SMA 20 / SMA 50
11.7 / 11.7
Bearish alignment (short < long)
Price vs SMA 200
Below
Long-term downtrend
RSI (14)
48.6
Neutral momentum
Financial Trend (4-Year)
Metric
FY23
FY24
FY25
FY26
3Y CAGR
Revenue
₹0 Cr
—
—
₹0 Cr
-5.7%
EBITDA
₹0 Cr
-₹0 Cr
-₹0 Cr
₹7 Cr
+145.1%
EBITDA Margin
2250.3%
—
—
39541.0%
—
PAT (Net Profit)
-₹1 Cr
-₹0 Cr
-₹0 Cr
-₹8 Cr
—
EPS
₹-0.48
₹-0.18
₹-0.19
₹-3.99
—
ROE
-5.6%
-2.1%
-2.4%
-69.4%
—
ROCE
-2.0%
-2.0%
-2.1%
-6.5%
—
Total Debt
₹2 Cr
₹2 Cr
₹2 Cr
₹2 Cr
-7.1%
Free Cash Flow
₹1 Cr
-₹0 Cr
-₹0 Cr
-₹4 Cr
—
🔴 Revenue has shrunk at 5.7% a year over 3 years.
🟢 EBITDA has grown at 145.1% a year over 3 years.
🟢 EBITDA Margin has risen from 2250.3% to 39541.0% over 3 years (+37290.6 pts).
🔴 ROE has fallen from -5.6% to -69.4% over 3 years (-63.8 pts).
🔴 ROCE has fallen from -2.0% to -6.5% over 3 years (-4.5 pts).
🟢 Total Debt has shrunk at 7.1% a year over 3 years.
🔴 Free Cash Flow has turned negative, from ₹1 Cr to -₹4 Cr.
Cross-check against the company's latest quarterly filing / investor presentation before acting.
1 metric couldn't be retrieved for this stock — this is more common for smaller or thinly-covered listings.
DalalBaazaar Thesis
🔴Business QualityWeak7.5/20
🟢Financial HealthStrong13/20
🔴GrowthWeak2.4/20
🔴ProfitabilityWeak3.8/15
🔴ValuationDemanding5.1/15
🔴RiskHigh4/10
Weak on the fundamentals
Poor scores on business quality without a price low enough to compensate. There is no obvious argument for owning this over a stronger company at a similar valuation. 2 high-severity red flags sit above this conclusion and should be read first.