The 60-second version of SKIL Infrastructure Limited — what it does, how it earns, and who it competes with, before any of the numbers below.
| Metric | FY22 | FY23 | FY24 | 2Y CAGR |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EBITDA | -₹1 Cr | ₹6 Cr | ₹24 Cr | — |
| PAT (Net Profit) | -₹161 Cr | ₹1,117 Cr | ₹9 Cr | — |
| EPS | ₹-7.43 | ₹51.6 | ₹0.6 | — |
| ROE | — | 618.8% | 4.6% | — |
| ROCE | — | 448.7% | 8.6% | — |
| Total Debt | ₹2,550 Cr | ₹2,062 Cr | ₹1,952 Cr | -12.5% |
| Free Cash Flow | ₹1 Cr | -₹188 Cr | ₹44 Cr | +541.3% |
| Company | P/E | ROE |
|---|---|---|
| LARSEN & TOUBRO LTD. | 30.1x | 15.2% |
| ADANI PORT & SEZ LTD | 29.9x | 14.1% |
| SIEMENS LTD | 88.8x | 10.5% |
A reasonable business at a reasonable price. Nothing here is alarming and nothing is compelling, which usually means the decision rests on things this data cannot see — the industry's direction, management's intent, and what else is available to you. 2 high-severity red flags sit above this conclusion and should be read first.