The 60-second version of S. M. Gold Limited — what it does, how it earns, and who it competes with, before any of the numbers below.
| Metric | FY23 | FY24 | FY25 | FY26 | 3Y CAGR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | ₹51 Cr | ₹62 Cr | ₹88 Cr | ₹156 Cr | +45.2% |
| EBITDA | ₹1 Cr | ₹2 Cr | ₹1 Cr | ₹3 Cr | +60.8% |
| EBITDA Margin | 1.3% | 2.5% | 1.5% | 1.7% | — |
| PAT (Net Profit) | ₹1 Cr | ₹1 Cr | ₹1 Cr | ₹2 Cr | +13.7% |
| EPS | ₹1.06 | ₹1.19 | ₹0.57 | ₹1.19 | +3.9% |
| ROE | 6.6% | 5.4% | 2.5% | 5.2% | — |
| ROCE | 11.3% | 10.2% | 6.1% | 8.4% | — |
| Total Debt | ₹13 Cr | ₹17 Cr | ₹16 Cr | ₹16 Cr | +5.8% |
| Free Cash Flow | -₹1 Cr | -₹1 Cr | ₹1 Cr | -₹5 Cr | — |
| Company | P/E | ROE |
|---|---|---|
| TITAN COMPANY LIMITED | 68.5x | 36.7% |
| TRENT LTD | 87.2x | 25.9% |
| AVENUE SUPERMARTS LIMITED | 69.9x | 12.7% |
| ASIAN PAINTS LIMITED | 46.9x | 22.3% |
A reasonable business at a reasonable price. Nothing here is alarming and nothing is compelling, which usually means the decision rests on things this data cannot see — the industry's direction, management's intent, and what else is available to you. 1 high-severity red flag sits above this conclusion and should be read first.