The 60-second version of Southern Magnesium and Chemicals Limited — what it does, how it earns, and who it competes with, before any of the numbers below.
| Metric | FY23 | FY24 | FY25 | FY26 | 3Y CAGR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | ₹9 Cr | ₹9 Cr | ₹12 Cr | ₹3 Cr | -26.8% |
| EBITDA | ₹5 Cr | ₹5 Cr | ₹4 Cr | ₹1 Cr | -47.2% |
| EBITDA Margin | 57.7% | 48.6% | 36.0% | 21.6% | — |
| PAT (Net Profit) | ₹4 Cr | ₹3 Cr | ₹3 Cr | ₹0 Cr | -67.0% |
| EPS | ₹11.77 | ₹11.1 | ₹10.66 | ₹0.42 | -67.1% |
| ROE | 55.2% | 34.2% | 24.7% | 1.0% | — |
| ROCE | 74.2% | 46.7% | 34.2% | 4.7% | — |
| Total Debt | ₹0 Cr | ₹2 Cr | ₹3 Cr | ₹5 Cr | +192.2% |
| Free Cash Flow | ₹3 Cr | -₹3 Cr | ₹5 Cr | -₹5 Cr | — |
| Company | P/E | ROE |
|---|---|---|
| HINDALCO INDUSTRIES LTD | 12.3x | 12.0% |
| VEDANTA LIMITED | 10.4x | 18.7% |
| TATA STEEL LIMITED | 19.8x | 10.8% |
Poor scores on business quality without a price low enough to compensate. There is no obvious argument for owning this over a stronger company at a similar valuation. 4 high-severity red flags sit above this conclusion and should be read first.