The 60-second version of Sula Vineyards Limited — what it does, how it earns, and who it competes with, before any of the numbers below.
| Metric | FY23 | FY24 | FY25 | FY26 | 3Y CAGR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | ₹471 Cr | ₹518 Cr | ₹525 Cr | ₹508 Cr | +2.6% |
| EBITDA | ₹159 Cr | ₹182 Cr | ₹150 Cr | ₹105 Cr | -13.0% |
| EBITDA Margin | 33.8% | 35.1% | 28.7% | 20.7% | — |
| PAT (Net Profit) | ₹84 Cr | ₹93 Cr | ₹70 Cr | ₹26 Cr | -32.7% |
| EPS | ₹10.18 | ₹11.05 | ₹8.32 | ₹3.04 | -33.2% |
| ROE | 15.8% | 17.0% | 12.0% | 4.4% | — |
| ROCE | 21.8% | 23.4% | 16.6% | 9.1% | — |
| Total Debt | ₹203 Cr | ₹324 Cr | ₹315 Cr | ₹333 Cr | +18.0% |
| Free Cash Flow | ₹21 Cr | ₹62 Cr | -₹9 Cr | ₹69 Cr | +48.8% |
| Company | P/E | ROE |
|---|---|---|
| HINDUSTAN UNILEVER LTD. | 42.5x | 21.5% |
| ITC LTD | 16.6x | 27.4% |
| NESTLE INDIA LIMITED | 59.8x | 79.9% |
| BRITANNIA INDUSTRIES LTD | 44.1x | 51.0% |
Poor scores on business quality without a price low enough to compensate. There is no obvious argument for owning this over a stronger company at a similar valuation. 3 high-severity red flags sit above this conclusion and should be read first.