The 60-second version of Sundaram Multi Pap Limited — what it does, how it earns, and who it competes with, before any of the numbers below.
Nothing stands out as clearly deteriorating on the years of data available.
| Metric | FY23 | FY24 | FY25 | FY26 | 3Y CAGR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | ₹114 Cr | ₹127 Cr | ₹127 Cr | ₹137 Cr | +6.2% |
| EBITDA | ₹17 Cr | ₹4 Cr | ₹6 Cr | ₹9 Cr | -19.5% |
| EBITDA Margin | 14.9% | 3.4% | 4.4% | 6.5% | — |
| PAT (Net Profit) | ₹3 Cr | -₹5 Cr | -₹5 Cr | ₹3 Cr | +7.1% |
| EPS | ₹0.09 | ₹-0.11 | ₹-0.11 | ₹0.07 | -8.0% |
| ROE | 2.7% | -5.5% | -5.8% | 3.5% | — |
| ROCE | 5.2% | -1.4% | -2.6% | 5.0% | — |
| Total Debt | ₹35 Cr | ₹33 Cr | ₹28 Cr | ₹22 Cr | -13.4% |
| Free Cash Flow | ₹11 Cr | ₹3 Cr | ₹7 Cr | -₹7 Cr | — |
| Company | P/E | ROE |
|---|---|---|
| TATA STEEL LIMITED | 19.8x | 10.8% |
| JSW STEEL LIMITED | 12.0x | 24.7% |
| ULTRATECH CEMENT LIMITED | 37.6x | 11.1% |
| ASIAN PAINTS LIMITED | 46.9x | 22.3% |
The low price is the whole case here, and the business underneath scores poorly. Cheap-and-weak is what a value trap looks like from the outside — it needs a specific reason the numbers are about to improve, not just the observation that they are low. 2 high-severity red flags sit above this conclusion and should be read first.