The 60-second version of Three M Paper Boards Limited — what it does, how it earns, and who it competes with, before any of the numbers below.
| Metric | FY23 | FY24 | FY25 | FY26 | 3Y CAGR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | ₹321 Cr | ₹270 Cr | ₹263 Cr | ₹294 Cr | -2.9% |
| EBITDA | ₹21 Cr | ₹26 Cr | ₹24 Cr | ₹21 Cr | -0.3% |
| EBITDA Margin | 6.5% | 9.7% | 9.2% | 7.0% | — |
| PAT (Net Profit) | ₹7 Cr | ₹11 Cr | ₹10 Cr | ₹7 Cr | +2.7% |
| EPS | ₹3.44 | ₹5.85 | ₹5.19 | — | — |
| ROE | 14.0% | 18.5% | 9.6% | 6.5% | — |
| ROCE | 14.6% | 19.0% | 13.0% | 9.1% | — |
| Total Debt | ₹82 Cr | ₹73 Cr | ₹62 Cr | ₹75 Cr | -2.8% |
| Free Cash Flow | ₹9 Cr | ₹4 Cr | -₹19 Cr | -₹9 Cr | — |
| Company | P/E | ROE |
|---|---|---|
| TATA STEEL LIMITED | 19.8x | 10.8% |
| JSW STEEL LIMITED | 12.0x | 24.7% |
| ULTRATECH CEMENT LIMITED | 37.6x | 11.1% |
| ASIAN PAINTS LIMITED | 46.9x | 22.3% |
The low price is the whole case here, and the business underneath scores poorly. Cheap-and-weak is what a value trap looks like from the outside — it needs a specific reason the numbers are about to improve, not just the observation that they are low. 2 high-severity red flags sit above this conclusion and should be read first.