The 60-second version of Transpek Industry Limited — what it does, how it earns, and who it competes with, before any of the numbers below.
| Metric | FY23 | FY24 | FY25 | FY26 | 3Y CAGR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | ₹826 Cr | ₹580 Cr | ₹648 Cr | ₹615 Cr | -9.4% |
| EBITDA | ₹164 Cr | ₹107 Cr | ₹130 Cr | ₹116 Cr | -11.0% |
| EBITDA Margin | 19.9% | 18.5% | 20.0% | 18.8% | — |
| PAT (Net Profit) | ₹83 Cr | ₹39 Cr | ₹49 Cr | ₹46 Cr | -18.2% |
| EPS | ₹149.45 | ₹69.03 | ₹87.25 | ₹81.72 | -18.2% |
| ROE | 14.2% | 5.7% | 6.5% | 5.9% | — |
| ROCE | 17.1% | 8.2% | 8.1% | 7.8% | — |
| Total Debt | ₹145 Cr | ₹123 Cr | ₹94 Cr | ₹74 Cr | -19.9% |
| Free Cash Flow | ₹62 Cr | ₹58 Cr | ₹114 Cr | ₹40 Cr | -13.2% |
| Company | P/E | ROE |
|---|---|---|
| PIDILITE INDUSTRIES LTD | 57.8x | 24.4% |
| SRF LTD | 33.8x | 15.4% |
| UPL LIMITED | 21.5x | 6.1% |
The low price is the whole case here, and the business underneath scores poorly. Cheap-and-weak is what a value trap looks like from the outside — it needs a specific reason the numbers are about to improve, not just the observation that they are low. 2 high-severity red flags sit above this conclusion and should be read first.