The 60-second version of TRF Limited — what it does, how it earns, and who it competes with, before any of the numbers below.
Nothing stands out as clearly improving on the years of data available.
| Metric | FY23 | FY24 | FY25 | FY26 | 3Y CAGR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | ₹174 Cr | ₹139 Cr | ₹120 Cr | ₹85 Cr | -21.2% |
| EBITDA | ₹103 Cr | ₹51 Cr | ₹41 Cr | ₹22 Cr | -40.1% |
| EBITDA Margin | 59.4% | 37.1% | 34.3% | 26.1% | — |
| PAT (Net Profit) | ₹89 Cr | ₹35 Cr | ₹26 Cr | -₹4 Cr | — |
| EPS | ₹71.14 | ₹31.45 | ₹23.44 | ₹-4.06 | — |
| ROE | 402.9% | 88.6% | 30.9% | -5.3% | — |
| ROCE | 81.3% | 35.3% | 20.4% | 4.3% | — |
| Total Debt | ₹18 Cr | ₹53 Cr | ₹40 Cr | ₹55 Cr | +43.7% |
| Free Cash Flow | ₹82 Cr | ₹29 Cr | ₹90 Cr | -₹8 Cr | — |
| Company | P/E | ROE |
|---|---|---|
| SIEMENS LTD | 88.8x | 10.5% |
| ABB INDIA LIMITED | 92.6x | 19.1% |
| LARSEN & TOUBRO LTD. | 30.1x | 15.2% |
| HAVELLS INDIA LIMITED | 43.5x | 17.1% |
The low price is the whole case here, and the business underneath scores poorly. Cheap-and-weak is what a value trap looks like from the outside — it needs a specific reason the numbers are about to improve, not just the observation that they are low. 5 high-severity red flags sit above this conclusion and should be read first.