The 60-second version of T.T. Limited — what it does, how it earns, and who it competes with, before any of the numbers below.
Nothing stands out as clearly deteriorating on the years of data available.
| Metric | FY23 | FY24 | FY25 | FY26 | 3Y CAGR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | ₹201 Cr | ₹207 Cr | ₹211 Cr | ₹189 Cr | -1.9% |
| EBITDA | ₹10 Cr | ₹20 Cr | ₹4 Cr | ₹13 Cr | +7.7% |
| EBITDA Margin | 5.2% | 9.5% | 2.0% | 6.9% | — |
| PAT (Net Profit) | -₹13 Cr | ₹5 Cr | ₹4 Cr | ₹0 Cr | — |
| EPS | ₹-0.57 | ₹0.21 | ₹0.19 | — | — |
| ROE | -18.9% | 6.5% | 4.5% | 0.2% | — |
| ROCE | 6.2% | 13.9% | 14.8% | 7.4% | — |
| Total Debt | ₹149 Cr | ₹129 Cr | ₹89 Cr | ₹80 Cr | -18.9% |
| Free Cash Flow | ₹22 Cr | ₹22 Cr | -₹15 Cr | -₹18 Cr | — |
| Company | P/E | ROE |
|---|---|---|
| MARUTI SUZUKI INDIA LTD. | 25.2x | 13.4% |
| TITAN COMPANY LIMITED | 68.5x | 36.7% |
| TRENT LTD | 87.2x | 25.9% |
| AVENUE SUPERMARTS LIMITED | 69.9x | 12.7% |
Poor scores on business quality without a price low enough to compensate. There is no obvious argument for owning this over a stronger company at a similar valuation. 1 high-severity red flag sits above this conclusion and should be read first.