The 60-second version of Tulsyan NEC Limited — what it does, how it earns, and who it competes with, before any of the numbers below.
Nothing stands out as clearly improving on the years of data available.
No clear supporting case emerges from the available numbers.
| Metric | FY23 | FY24 | FY25 | FY26 | 3Y CAGR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | ₹1,022 Cr | ₹977 Cr | ₹868 Cr | ₹808 Cr | -7.5% |
| EBITDA | ₹6 Cr | -₹37 Cr | -₹49 Cr | -₹68 Cr | — |
| EBITDA Margin | 0.6% | -3.7% | -5.6% | -8.4% | — |
| PAT (Net Profit) | ₹246 Cr | -₹49 Cr | -₹73 Cr | -₹64 Cr | — |
| EPS | ₹148.48 | ₹-29.67 | ₹-44.08 | ₹-39.08 | — |
| ROE | 62.2% | -14.3% | -29.0% | -34.7% | — |
| ROCE | 29.0% | -7.6% | -13.9% | -11.7% | — |
| Total Debt | ₹377 Cr | ₹335 Cr | ₹372 Cr | ₹406 Cr | +2.5% |
| Free Cash Flow | ₹335 Cr | ₹12 Cr | ₹25 Cr | -₹7 Cr | — |
| Company | P/E | ROE |
|---|---|---|
| TATA STEEL LIMITED | 19.8x | 10.8% |
| JSW STEEL LIMITED | 12.0x | 24.7% |
| JINDAL STEEL LIMITED | 39.1x | 5.3% |
| STEEL AUTHORITY OF INDIA | 16.5x | 7.1% |
Poor scores on business quality without a price low enough to compensate. There is no obvious argument for owning this over a stronger company at a similar valuation. 5 high-severity red flags sit above this conclusion and should be read first.