The 60-second version of UCAL Limited — what it does, how it earns, and who it competes with, before any of the numbers below.
No clear supporting case emerges from the available numbers.
| Metric | FY23 | FY24 | FY25 | FY26 | 3Y CAGR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | ₹820 Cr | ₹719 Cr | ₹797 Cr | ₹833 Cr | +0.5% |
| EBITDA | ₹64 Cr | ₹48 Cr | ₹43 Cr | ₹56 Cr | -4.8% |
| EBITDA Margin | 7.9% | 6.7% | 5.4% | 6.7% | — |
| PAT (Net Profit) | ₹1 Cr | -₹25 Cr | -₹16 Cr | -₹33 Cr | — |
| EPS | ₹0.39 | ₹-11.42 | ₹-7.36 | ₹-15.07 | — |
| ROE | 0.2% | -6.8% | -4.6% | -10.2% | — |
| ROCE | 6.0% | 2.9% | 3.4% | 0.1% | — |
| Total Debt | ₹205 Cr | ₹268 Cr | ₹312 Cr | ₹186 Cr | -3.3% |
| Free Cash Flow | ₹43 Cr | -₹49 Cr | ₹5 Cr | ₹91 Cr | +28.1% |
| Company | P/E | ROE |
|---|---|---|
| BOSCH LIMITED | 56.9x | 15.9% |
| MARUTI SUZUKI INDIA LTD. | 25.2x | 13.4% |
| TVS MOTOR COMPANY LTD | 56.8x | 35.8% |
| EICHER MOTORS LTD | 34.7x | 23.0% |
Poor scores on business quality without a price low enough to compensate. There is no obvious argument for owning this over a stronger company at a similar valuation. 2 high-severity red flags sit above this conclusion and should be read first.