The 60-second version of United Foodbrands Limited — what it does, how it earns, and who it competes with, before any of the numbers below.
Nothing stands out as clearly improving on the years of data available.
No clear supporting case emerges from the available numbers.
| Metric | FY23 | FY24 | FY25 | FY26 | 3Y CAGR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | ₹1,231 Cr | ₹1,249 Cr | ₹1,230 Cr | ₹1,336 Cr | +2.8% |
| EBITDA | ₹233 Cr | ₹212 Cr | ₹212 Cr | ₹196 Cr | -5.5% |
| EBITDA Margin | 18.9% | 17.0% | 17.2% | 14.7% | — |
| PAT (Net Profit) | ₹17 Cr | -₹13 Cr | -₹28 Cr | -₹59 Cr | — |
| EPS | ₹4.32 | ₹-3.44 | ₹-7.11 | ₹-15.13 | — |
| ROE | 4.2% | -3.4% | -7.7% | -19.1% | — |
| ROCE | 9.3% | 5.8% | 4.6% | 1.4% | — |
| Total Debt | ₹685 Cr | ₹686 Cr | ₹758 Cr | ₹885 Cr | +9.0% |
| Free Cash Flow | ₹82 Cr | ₹133 Cr | ₹110 Cr | ₹94 Cr | +4.9% |
| Company | P/E | ROE |
|---|---|---|
| MARUTI SUZUKI INDIA LTD. | 25.2x | 13.4% |
| TITAN COMPANY LIMITED | 68.5x | 36.7% |
| TRENT LTD | 87.2x | 25.9% |
| AVENUE SUPERMARTS LIMITED | 69.9x | 12.7% |
Poor scores on business quality without a price low enough to compensate. There is no obvious argument for owning this over a stronger company at a similar valuation. 4 high-severity red flags sit above this conclusion and should be read first.