The 60-second version of Universal Autofoundry Limited — what it does, how it earns, and who it competes with, before any of the numbers below.
Nothing stands out as clearly improving on the years of data available.
No clear supporting case emerges from the available numbers.
| Metric | FY23 | FY24 | FY25 | FY26 | 3Y CAGR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | ₹236 Cr | ₹203 Cr | ₹193 Cr | ₹210 Cr | -3.8% |
| EBITDA | ₹26 Cr | ₹16 Cr | ₹17 Cr | ₹10 Cr | -28.2% |
| EBITDA Margin | 10.9% | 7.8% | 8.8% | 4.5% | — |
| PAT (Net Profit) | ₹10 Cr | ₹5 Cr | ₹2 Cr | -₹3 Cr | — |
| EPS | ₹10.38 | ₹4.06 | ₹1.89 | ₹-2.69 | — |
| ROE | 18.1% | 6.7% | 3.1% | -4.6% | — |
| ROCE | 24.7% | 10.1% | 7.1% | -0.2% | — |
| Total Debt | ₹55 Cr | ₹37 Cr | ₹46 Cr | ₹71 Cr | +9.2% |
| Free Cash Flow | -₹5 Cr | -₹16 Cr | -₹6 Cr | -₹12 Cr | — |
| Company | P/E | ROE |
|---|---|---|
| BOSCH LIMITED | 56.9x | 15.9% |
| MARUTI SUZUKI INDIA LTD. | 25.2x | 13.4% |
| TVS MOTOR COMPANY LTD | 56.8x | 35.8% |
| EICHER MOTORS LTD | 34.7x | 23.0% |
Poor scores on business quality without a price low enough to compensate. There is no obvious argument for owning this over a stronger company at a similar valuation. 4 high-severity red flags sit above this conclusion and should be read first.