The 60-second version of UPL Limited — what it does, how it earns, and who it competes with, before any of the numbers below.
Nothing stands out as clearly improving on the years of data available.
| Metric | FY23 | FY24 | FY25 | FY26 | 3Y CAGR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | ₹53,134 Cr | ₹42,599 Cr | ₹46,262 Cr | ₹51,303 Cr | -1.2% |
| EBITDA | ₹10,967 Cr | ₹4,387 Cr | ₹7,383 Cr | ₹9,916 Cr | -3.3% |
| EBITDA Margin | 20.6% | 10.3% | 16.0% | 19.3% | — |
| PAT (Net Profit) | ₹3,570 Cr | -₹1,200 Cr | ₹897 Cr | ₹1,922 Cr | -18.6% |
| EPS | ₹43.92 | ₹-17.45 | ₹9.62 | ₹22.32 | -20.2% |
| ROE | 12.0% | -4.3% | 2.8% | 5.5% | — |
| ROCE | 13.7% | 2.1% | 6.8% | 9.9% | — |
| Total Debt | ₹23,939 Cr | ₹29,754 Cr | ₹25,099 Cr | ₹23,576 Cr | -0.5% |
| Free Cash Flow | ₹5,391 Cr | ₹326 Cr | ₹8,456 Cr | ₹5,449 Cr | +0.4% |
| Company | P/E | ROE |
|---|---|---|
| TATA STEEL LIMITED | 19.8x | 10.8% |
| JSW STEEL LIMITED | 12.0x | 24.7% |
| ULTRATECH CEMENT LIMITED | 37.6x | 11.1% |
| ASIAN PAINTS LIMITED | 46.9x | 22.3% |
Poor scores on business quality without a price low enough to compensate. There is no obvious argument for owning this over a stronger company at a similar valuation. 1 high-severity red flag sits above this conclusion and should be read first.