The 60-second version of VMS Industries Limited — what it does, how it earns, and who it competes with, before any of the numbers below.
| Metric | FY23 | FY24 | FY25 | FY26 | 3Y CAGR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | ₹140 Cr | ₹266 Cr | ₹289 Cr | ₹157 Cr | +3.9% |
| EBITDA | ₹3 Cr | ₹11 Cr | ₹11 Cr | ₹5 Cr | +27.2% |
| EBITDA Margin | 1.9% | 4.0% | 3.9% | 3.4% | — |
| PAT (Net Profit) | ₹2 Cr | ₹6 Cr | ₹7 Cr | ₹1 Cr | -16.3% |
| EPS | ₹1.42 | ₹3.56 | ₹2.91 | ₹0.6 | -24.9% |
| ROE | 4.3% | 9.9% | 7.1% | 1.5% | — |
| ROCE | 7.1% | 15.0% | 10.8% | 4.7% | — |
| Total Debt | ₹29 Cr | ₹22 Cr | ₹15 Cr | ₹29 Cr | +0.5% |
| Free Cash Flow | -₹6 Cr | ₹44 Cr | -₹48 Cr | -₹31 Cr | — |
| Company | P/E | ROE |
|---|---|---|
| LARSEN & TOUBRO LTD. | 30.1x | 15.2% |
| SIEMENS LTD | 88.8x | 10.5% |
| ABB INDIA LIMITED | 92.6x | 19.1% |
The low price is the whole case here, and the business underneath scores poorly. Cheap-and-weak is what a value trap looks like from the outside — it needs a specific reason the numbers are about to improve, not just the observation that they are low. 3 high-severity red flags sit above this conclusion and should be read first.